Why Won’t SJWs Called Bill Cinton a Rapist? by David Garrett

http://www.returnofkings.com/75559/why-dont-sjws-call-bill-clinton-a-rapist

Well, I would say that everybody should be believed at first until they are disbelieved based on evidence.

— Hillary Clinton, in response to a question about whether her husband’s sexual assault and rape accusers, Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey, should be believed.

In recent years, Hillary Clinton has tried to jostle her way into becoming the nation’s premier sexual assault grandstander. For this mantle she faces stiff competition, particularly in the form of perpetual due process haters like Senators Claire McCaskill and Kirsten Gillibrand. Clinton has told “survivors” (read: accusers) of sexual assault that they have “the right to be believed.” Apparently, though, this right does not extend to those who have previously alleged that her husband Bill sexually harassed or raped them.

Hillary was asked after a recent address whether Bill Clinton accusers Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey should be believed. She responded that women should be believed initially and provided they are not “disbelieved based on evidence.” She then laughed broadly, without stipulating how exactly the allegations against Bill Clinton had been disproven, especially since her husband paid Paula Jones$850,000 in the 1990s to stop pursuing her sexual harassment claim. Ironically, Clinton’s answer came within days of literally thousands of people declaring James Deen a rapist due to tweets and other social media posts.

Cranking up the feminist rhetoric in the lead-up to her 2016 Presidential run, Hillary has attached herself to everything both rape-related and leftwing, from the Mattress Girl debacle to the fabricated 1-in-5 campus sexual assault statistic. The media will happily try to fact-check Donald Trump on matters like New Jersey Muslims allegedly celebrating the 9/11 attacks, but patently fails to give the same attention to a woman who calls for guilty until proven innocent for every man accused of rape, bar her husband.

Why doesn’t the powerful man, vulnerable woman thesis ever apply to Bill Clinton?

 

We constantly hear about how powerful men accused of sexual assault and/or rape, from Bill Cosby to Jian Ghomeshi, supposedly get away with it because of their position, wealth, or fame. Conversely, one is supposed to believe that Bill Clinton’s accusers have fallen away because he is actually innocent. So, in other words, an African-American sitcom star with chronic arthritis is powerful enough to act with impunity for years but the President of the United States wasn’t able to potentially suppress or force his way out of rape allegations?

Clinton’s social and political capital as the most powerful man of the 1990s more than eclipsed any financial or celebrity clout possessed by a middle-aged and then decrepit Bill Cosby. Even when we look at the least credible Clinton accuser, Kathleen Willey, who said Bill fondled her in 1993, it is easy to see her as a “non-perfect victim” in feminist parlance.

Coming up against the most formidable leader in the world, can we really expect she would hold her story together? Remember, Jackie Coakley and Emma Sulkowicz are forgiven by SJWs for massive delays in accusing and blatant changes in their stories, and this is when their falsely accused targets are mere students.

 

The power game, not justice, is what Hillary Clinton wants

 

As a well-known lawyer, Hillary Clinton defended a man accused of child rape and she was recorded laughing about the trial later. Then, when she was even older and her husband was campaigning for President, she labeled sexual harassment and rape allegations against her husband as “bimbo eruptions”. Purported slut-shaming and other attempts to undermine women were part of Hillary’s own political toolkit well before she started excoriating so-called misogynists for doing exactly the same thing.

Fundamentally, her desire for rape convictions by social media is designed to win her the crucial backing of the rabid SJWs so accustomed to stealing both the media’s spotlight and bias. Her husband, who has a history of lying about extramarital affairs outside the other criminal accusations, will conveniently have his alleged rape antecedence brushed aside. Meanwhile, men without Bill’s history of overall deceit, including Paul Nungesser, will continue to be crucified in print, on television and online as “rapists”.

 

Expect the worst when Hillary is elected

For the record, I do not believe Bill Clinton harassed, raped, or sexually assaulted any of these women. If I did, it still wouldn’t remove the onus on his accusers and the state to secure any convictions via the courts. One can only sigh at how Bill Clinton is excused from the SJW mob mentality that literally hunts down and destroys the career prospects and lives of men never found guilty by the system, from Paul Nungesser to the Duke lacrosse team.

We live in a surreal world where the characters of powerless male students are impugned but the most influential members of the left will be afforded all the formal and informal protections of classical liberal jurisprudence. One can be sure that other Democratic political figures have been privately accused of sexual assault or rape but managed to stifle the voices of their accusers.

Is it just me or is the end of 2016 and the likely ascension of Hillary Clinton to the White House going to mark another Brave New World for trials by public opinion?

 

Feminism: Death Cult Chaos

http://theothermccain.com/2015/12/30/feminism-death-cult-chaos/

 

 

“Feminism Is a Totalitarian Movement to Destroy Civilization as We Know It” — this is a truth that cannot be repeated often enough as we watch the Democrat-Media Complex mobilize all its resources to elect Hillary Clinton president. Monday night I found myself assailed on Twitter by Clintonistas who resented my characterization of feminism as a totalitarian ideology as rigid and intolerant as the neo-Stalinism of the North Korean regime. The one thing Democrats cannot tolerate is the truth, and suppressing the truth about feminism — a movement that is not about “equality,” but instead is about power — is therefore necessary to Democrat success in the 2016 election campaign. If the truth is known, Democrats lose. Meanwhile, in England . . .

A student has spoken out about the challenges of identifying as neither male or female and also being attracted to both genders.
Speaking with the Liverpool Echo, Amy Toon – who studies modern history and politics at the University of Liverpool – described a feeling of relief at being able to self-identify as being non-binary and pansexual after years of being in the unknown.
However, despite being generally treated with respect, Amy told the site being referred to as “a girl” is upsetting and that many people think gay marriage is enough, but insisted the opposite. Amy also added how the option of hormone replacement would mean having to wait for up to five years, and said: “You have to live for quite a while being very unhappy with who you are.” . . .
Amy, originally from Leeds, described having to sign on as being female, however, services like the NHS provide the option of ‘Mx’ instead of the usual ‘Miss/Mr/Mrs’, and also told the news site “they/them” is a preferable way of being addressed, whereas others may opt for “ze, hir, hirs, and xe, xem, or xyr.”
Even though Amy has received support since self-identifying with both groups, the undergraduate highlighted feelings of anxiety and depression when being called a “girl” and added howstudents at the university “can be really transphobic.” Amy added: “They make stupid statements and our LGBT posters were torn down.” . . .

Amy Toon is a victim of society, oppressed by pronouns. How dare you call a girl a “girl,” you heteronormative transphobic bigot?

 

As easy as it is to laugh at such products of feminist ideology, we must not overlook the tragic dimension — what if it were your daughter who had been brainwashed by the transgender cult? — and the disastrous social consequences. A couple of weeks ago, I interviewed a parent whose child had been captured by this movement. It was a story familiar to anyone who has paid attention to this trend: A tomboyish daughter, a good student, generally well-behaved but somewhat socially awkward, quite suddenly becomes hostile and defiant, announces that she is “he,” denounces her parents as bigots for questioning the decision to “transition,” and pursues a new persona based on an extreme alienation from her female identity. Only after this dramatic and heartbreaking departure — their daughter not merely renouncing her identity, but rejecting her family — did the parents discover the precipitating cause. Their daughter, trying to cope with an adolescent identity crisis, had gone exploring the corners of the Internet where advocates of transgenderism celebrate “transition” as a miraculous cure for every confused teenager’s problem. These FtM (female-to-male) transgender blogs feature photos and videos showing the effects of testosterone injections and weightlifting in developing a masculinized physique, and the results of “top” surgery (i.e., mastectomy) by which tomboys turn themselves into simulations of men. Inside the transgender cult’s online echo chamber, the teenager encounters a very one-sided message.

“Propaganda” is not too strong a word to describe the transgender cult’s carefully calculated campaign to convert the confusion of an adolescent crisis into the certainty of “transition” into a new identity. Much like a porngraphy addict, the vulnerable teenager who is at first merely curious about transgenderism may quickly become obsessed, and parents whose children fall prey to the transgender cult often report that their teenager went from normal to weirdo to fanatic in a matter of months.

Laughter is not the appropriate response to these tragedies, and it is not just Christian conservatives who are raising concerns about the transgender cult’s recruitment campaign. Radical feminists have been warning about this trend for years. The blog 4th Wave Now was started by a feminist who watched in horror as her daughter was captured by the transgender cult. Understand that the feminist mom responsible for 4th Wave Now enthusiastically approved of her daughter’s lesbianism; it was when the teenage lesbian rejected female identity that her mother became alarmed. Feminist gender theory — the social construction of thegender binary within the heterosexual matrix — denies that there is any such thing as “human nature,” and feminists condemn heterosexuality as “the ideology of male supremacy.” Teaching girls to hate and fear men is what feminist motherhood is all about, so when their daughters want to become men — identifying with the hated male oppressor — we understand why feminists panic. Instead of smashing patriarchy, their daughters want to be the patriarchy.

 

The feminist crusade to destroy civilization in the name of “equality” has produced many ironic results, and we may be tempted to laugh when the debris of this destructive project lands on the doorsteps of man-hating fanatics who have fomented this War Against Human Nature. Yes, we can ridicule freaks like Tobias “Tobi” Hill-Meyer, whose career as a transgender pornographer brought shame on his/”her” lesbian feminist mother(s). However, the expanding cultural influence of radical feminism — promoted for decades in university Women’s Studies classrooms, and now increasingly extended to the public school curriculum — is aimed at all children, and every parent concerned for the future must pay attention. “The Queering of Feminism” means that “equality” requires the destruction of morality. All critical dissent must be suppressed while government schools indoctrinate children in the movement’s anti-male/anti-heterosexual ideology. Wellesley College Professor Julie Matthaei credits feminism with exposing “the oppressiveness of traditional heterosexuality” in a movement that “advocated lesbianism as an option for women.” By demonizing males and stigmatizing heterosexuality in this way, feminism seeks to create equality, but what it actually creates is decadence and chaos.

 

Meanwhile, in England . . .

The number of primary school-aged children, some as young as four, beginning to “transition” their gender is rising rapidly in the UK. The popularity of the fad appears to be clustered, with children copying others in the same schools.
Up to 80 primary school-aged children a year are now seeking help towards potentially changing their gender, the chair of Mermaids, a charity which lobbies for families who believe their children and teenagers are transgendered, has revealed.
Speaking to the Telegraph, Susie Green said that, in some cases, British children as young as four are already in the process of “transitioning” to another sex.
She also described how her organisation has observed a cluster effect across the country, with children following one and another in the same school; a school where there might be a teacher who promotes transgender ideology.
Her anecdotal evidence correlates with the results of a study by Mark Zucker at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto, Canada, which found that transgenderism was more prominent and persistent among children when promoted by adults.
Researchers observed that children who saw therapists and others in authority who assume that they belong to the opposite sex can actually become more distressed, exacerbating their “gender dysphoric identity.”

Ask yourself, why is this trend so noticeable in England? One reason may be the 2010 Equality Act which effectively criminalizes criticism of the LGBT agenda. By making “sexual orientation” a protected category, this law not only requires schools to hire gay teachers, but makes it hazardous for anyone to express disapproval of homosexuality. LGBT advocacy in British schools is now ubiquitous and exempt from criticism, as is the case in many American school systems, where such advocacy often takes the form of “anti-bullying” programs. Is it any wonder, really, that many young people are so deeply confused about their sexuality?

Many parents are clueless about what is being taught in their children’s schools, but when we see transgender children in elementary school and LGBT clubs in high schools, it becomes obvious that the education system itself is dedicated to promoting this ideology. However, at the same time, the feminist fanatics who created the phony “rape epidemic” hysteria on college campuses are now promoting “consent education” in K-12 schools— to make sure that all students are warned that males are dangerous and heterosexuality is “rape culture.”

 

 

Feminism is a Death Cult, whose only goal is destruction — destroying religion, family, liberty, morality and, ultimately, human life itself.

Feminism and Male Trafficking

 

http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/sexual-assault-on-men/feminism-and-male-trafficking/

 

Human Trafficking is a scourge on civilization. It is condemnable irrespective of gender of the victim.

However, feminists have made trafficking a gender issue rather than a human issue. Traditional discourse on human trafficking name men as “predators” or buyers of sex, and women as the “prey,” the vulnerable and at-risk population.

Here are what feminists think and do about human trafficking:-

1) According to Institute for Feminism & Human Rights, Stockholm, Sweden:-

Prostitution and human trafficking are crimes, serious human rights violations, and contrary to the dignity and integrity of women and girls that must and will be abolished. The legalization and industrialization of prostitution activities normalizes an extreme form of sexual discrimination and violence, and strengthens male domination over all women and girls – individually and systemically.

Without men’s assumption that they have the right to demand, buy and sexually exploit women and girls, prostitution and human trafficking would not exist.(1)

2) According to feminist Gloria Steinem “Prostitution is not inevitable, it is only about unequal distribution of power. Today we face an epidemic of sex trafficking. More people are being pushed into it than even the slave trade” (2)

3) Anti-prostitution feminists hold that prostitution is a form of exploitation of women and male dominance over women, and a practice which is the result of the existing patriarchal societal order.

4) Feminist Kathleen Barry (3) co-founded the United Nations NGO, the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women (CATW). Institutions like these have been advancing certain feminist interests, using trafficking in women as a powerful metaphor. Also the problem of third world trafficking in women is being used by western feminist as justification for its own interventionist impulses in these countries. (4)

What is fundamentally wrong with these feminist ideas are:-

1) Human Trafficking is practiced not just for using victims for sex-workers but also for use as labourers, soldiers in conflict zone, for source of organs, begging, drug trafficking, pornography etc. For most of these works, males are more in demand than females.

2) Males are also used for sex trade.

3) Women and transgender also buy sex.

4) Women are also actively involved in trafficking. In Europe, for example, women make up a larger share of those convicted for human trafficking offenses than for most other forms of crime.

5) Not all prostitutes are victims of sex trafficking and feminist are trying to label sex work as sexual exploitation to advance their own cause (5) (6). Many take up sex work on their own and resent feminist intervention. According to the Durbar Mahila Samanwaya Committee [which is a collectivization of 65000 sex workers and functions as an exclusive forum of female, male and transgender sex workers in West Bengal, India] :-

Like many other occupations, sex work is also an occupation, and it is probably one of the ‘oldest’ profession’ in the world because it meets an important social demand………… People who are interested in our welfare, and many are genuinely concerned, often cannot think beyond rehabilitating us or abolishing prostitution altogether. (7)

6) Prostitution is not about unequal distribution of power between genders but about poverty.

The feminist tryst with trafficking and prostitution has unfortunately resulted in skewed legislative policies worldwide which largely ignores the problem of Male victims of Human Trafficking.

The Middle-east and South-east Asia are regions where male trafficking is being practiced widely.

In war-torn Afghanistan human-trafficking is a serious problem. Reports on trafficking in persons in Afghanistan, have suggested that boys were more at risk of trafficking than girls. (8)

Trafficking of Boys is termed Qachaq-e-Ensan, Tejarat-e-Ensan in local Afghan parlance. The three main types of exploitation of male child survivors of trafficking are: –

• Sexual (including bacha bazi)

• Forced labour

• Child recruitment for military groups

Bacha bazi is a slang term that is commonly used for sexual slavery and child prostitution in which prepubescent and adolescent boys are sold to wealthy or powerful men for entertainment and sexual activities. A documentary film by Najibullah Quraishi about the practice of bacha bazi was screened by the UK Royal Society of Arts on March 29, 2010.

Trafficking of child soldiers is also widely practiced. In both identified cases, the boys were kidnapped by unknown people. Similar to sexual exploitation, drugs were commonly mentioned as ways of keeping boys under control. The boys were kept in rooms with other boys and indoctrinated with ideas of extreme Islamic ideology.

Outside of the three major types of exploitation, trafficked boys face exploitation by being used for:-

• Drug smuggling

• Street begging networks

• Criminal networks

• Organ cutting

In Cambodia men and boys are deceived onto long-haul fishing boats that go out to sea for up to two years or more. They live in virtual prisons and the victims endure inhuman working conditions, and physical abuse. (9)

In Thailand males from Burma are trafficked for acting male sex workers. (10)

Another area where trafficking is widely practiced is the middle-East. Camel racing is a popular sport in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain, Jordan, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Australia, and Mongolia. Professional camel racing, like horse racing, is an event for betting and tourist attraction. Children are often favoured as jockeys because of their light weight.

Camels are often controlled by child jockeys. Impoverished families from Pakistan, Sudan, Mauritania, India and Bangladesh sell their sons to work as jockeys in the lucrative camel races in the United Arab Emirates.(11)

Although banned for over a decade, the camel racing profession is still home to an estimated 3,000 children. These children live in slave-like conditions. The children are starved to make sure they weigh less than 20 kg (44 lbs) since the light weight helps the camel run faster. The young boys are left exposed to the elements as they are forced to sleep next to the camels at night. Without the proper shoes, many burn their feet in the hot desert sand. The young camel jockeys are beaten for not understanding Arabic, given electric shocks for being “overweight” and rampant sexual abuse by the camel trainers. The extreme physical and emotional abuse at such a young age has dire consequences for the little boys who are usually discarded once they get older and can’t stay within the weight requirements.

Male victims are seen in the U.S. as well, often in child pornography. The sex trafficking of young boys feeds the high demand for child pornography. More than half of these features boys rather than girls. (12)

In light of above it is imperative that International and government bodies should free themselves of “Women only” view of human trafficking and look at it from a neutral perspective.

References:

  1. http://feminismandhumanrights.org/thematic-areas/feminism-and-male-violence-against-women-and-girls-including-prostitution-and-trafficking-in-human-beings/
  2. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/up-against-the-epidemic-of-trafficking/article3276106.ece
  3. http://www.kathleenbarry.net/abolish-prostitution-now.htm
  4. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/fr/journal/v67/n1/abs/9496704a.html
  5. http://jezebel.com/5978052/some-feminists-are-wrongfully-fighting-against-sex-workers
  6. https://reason.com/archives/2013/01/21/the-war-on-sex-workers/singlepage
  7. http://www.bayswan.org/manifest.html
  8. https://hagarinternational.org/international/our-work/where-we-work/afghanistan/forgotten-no-more-restoration-for-afghan-boy-survivors/
  9. http://www.notip.org.cn/UserImages/00000847.pdf
  10. http://www.irrawaddy.org/burma/majority-male-sex-workers-chiang-mai-burmese-study.html
  11. http://tribune.com.pk/story/545794/camel-jockeys-popular-arab-sport-costs-pakistani-children-their-sanity/
  12. Michael T. Tien,Human Trafficking: the Missing Male Victim, 18Pub. Interest L. Rptr.207(2013). Available at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/pilr/vol18/iss3/6