The Feminist-Industrial Complex: Lesbians ‘Learning How to Scream’

Tax Payer funded Concordia University Endorsing Anti-Male Voilence.

 

http://theothermccain.com/2015/12/22/the-feminist-industrial-complex-lesbians-learning-how-to-scream/

 

More than 40,000 students are enrolled at Concordia University in Quebec, one of Canada’s largest universities and home to the Simone de Beauvoir Institute, named for the author of The Second Sex (and Jean Paul Sartre’s lover). The institute employs four full-time professors, 10 part-time professors, two visiting professors and 25 research associates. The total undergraduate enrollment is “usually around 150 in our Women’s Studies Major program and 70 others in our Specialization, Minor and Certificate programs.”

Among the fall courses at the institute was “Feminist Perspectives on Culture” (WSDB491) taught by Magdalena Olszanowski, a part-time instructor in communications who has written a paper entitled “Feminist Imaging Practices: Fostering Community on Instagram Through the Hashtag.” Here is the course description of WSDB491:

This seminar explores the central concepts and theories in feminist cultural studies, as they inform feminist, post-colonial, queer, and post-structuralist understandings of culture. The focus is on women as cultural producers and subjects in/of various cultural texts (e.g. cinema, visual arts, music, advertising, popular media, feminist writings). The discursive construction of gender, as it is inflected by class, race, sexuality, and location, is examined as well as the ways in which it is used, displayed, imagined and performed in contemporary culture. Students develop practical and analytical skills, posing questions of how particular cultural narratives function within social, political and economic contexts. Students are required to participate in and lead discussions of the readings and to create and/or critique cultural productions.

 

Ah, “the discursive construction of gender”! This senior-level class — open only to students who have completed a prerequisite 30 credit hours of Women’s Studies courses — distinguished itself by creating a Tumblr blog, which includes among other things, a course syllabus for  “Feminist Perspectives on Culture.” What are these Concordia feminists required to read in this senior-level course? Among the assigned readings is “Rape Culture and the Feminist Politics of Social Media” by Carrie Rentschler, director of the Institute for Gender, Sexuality, and Feminist Studies at McGill University in Montreal. Professor Rentschler cites the 1993 bookTransforming a Rape Culture in defining the phenomenon:

 

Rape culture refers to the “complex of beliefs that encourages male sexual aggression and supports violence against women. It is a society where violence is seen as sexy and sexuality as violent. In a rape culture women perceive a continuum of threatened violence that ranges from sexual remarks to sexual touching to rape itself. A rape culture condones physical and emotional terrorism against women as the norm.”

 

Thus, feminists are taught that “sexual remarks” are part of “a continuum of threatened violence” that “encourages male sexual aggression” and “condones . . . emotional terrorism.” Men cannot be permitted even to talk about sex, because anything a man says about sex is part of the “continuum” of rape culture. Stigmatizing male sexuality as inherently violent and harmful to women fosters a sexual paranoia (“Fear and Loathing of the Penis”) that is fundamental to the feminist worldview.

It is scarcely surprising, therefore, that the assigned texts in “Feminist Perspectives on Culture” include SCUM Manifesto, written by Valerie Solanas, the psychotic lesbian who attempted to murder artist Andy Warhol in 1968. Homicidal rage against males is celebrated in this Women’s Studies course as “the culture of resistance.”

 

Endorsing anti-male violence as “resistance,” by assigning the deranged screed of a notorious criminal, while accusing men of “emotional terrorism” merely for making “sexual remarks,” is typical of the Feminist-Industrial Complex of academic Women’s Studies. In these programs, feminist intellectuals provide emotionally vulnerable young women with one-sided arguments that function as rationalizations to justify an attitude of hatred and hostility toward men. The indoctrination process in Women’s Studies programs can best be understood by studying cult “mind control” methods. It may be assumed that all women who enroll in these programs are inspired by some level of anti-male prejudice, sharing the feminist belief expressed by the 1969 Redstockings manifesto: “Women are an oppressed class. . . . We identify the agents of our oppression as men. . . . All men have oppressed women.” The Women’s Studies curriculum provides young women with arguments that articulate that sense of oppression, justifying their resentment of men as “agents” of the hostile patriarchal force arrayed against them. Within this academic cult environment, students are bombarded constantly with information that supports feminism’s anti-male worldview, while criticism and dissent are prohibited.

The syllabus for “Feminist Perspectives on Culture” includes a paragraph on “Learning Environment” which explains that “the production of research on culture . . . cannot be apolitical, value-free, neutral, non-biased.” Professor Olszanowski declares that “her role is to offer an analytical framework for understanding culture from a feminist standpoint” before issuing this warning:

 

It is the responsibility of all to create a learning environment where one can safely say what one thinks, keeping in mind the collective responsibility of all to create an environment free of racism, sexism, heterosexism, cissexism, cisgenderism, classism, ageism and ableism.

A student “can safely say what one thinks,” but only if what is said does not violate the “responsibility” to “create an environment” that excludes a long list of possible Thought Crimes. Of course, if every student in this senior-level class has already taken at least 30 hours of Women’s Studies courses, they have almost certainly attained a level of intellectual homogeneity that would rival the Soviet Politburo under Stalin, so that Professor Olszanowski’s warning is a pro forma gesture.

Probably no senior student in the Simone de Beauvoir Institute would even notice the contradiction apparent in a class where (a) the assigned texts include a would-be murderer’s anti-male manifesto, and (b) the course syllabus features a “safe space” disclaimer:

 

Concordia classrooms are considered ‘safe space classrooms’. In order to create a climate for open and honest dialogue and to encourage the broadest range of viewpoints, it is important for class participants to treat each other with respect. Name-calling, accusations, verbal attacks, sarcasm, and other negative exchanges are counter-productive to successful teaching and learning. The purpose of class discussions is to generate greater understanding about different topics. The expression of the broadest range of ideas, including dissenting views, helps to accomplish this goal. However, in expressing viewpoints, students should try to raise questions and comments in ways that will promote learning, rather than defensiveness and feelings of conflict in other students. Thus, questions and comments should be asked or stated in such a way that will promote greater insight into the awareness of topics as opposed to anger and conflict. The purpose of dialogue and discussion is not to reach a consensus, nor to convince each other of different viewpoints. Rather, the purpose of dialogue in the classroom is to reach higher levels of learning by examining different viewpoints and opinions with respect and civility.

 

Yes, we must have “respect and civility”! No “name-calling” or “sarcasm” will be tolerated in this class where all men are portrayed as complicit in oppression, rape and “emotional terrorism”! We will permit no “negative exchanges” which might be “counter-productive” while we teach the “culture of resistance” by reading SCUM Manifesto by Valerie Solanas!

Feel free to examine the, uh, scholarship these students have produced, which is to feminist insanity what Baskin-Robbins is to ice cream. Among the 31 flavors of crazy offered by these senior Women’s Studies majors is “an online feminist art exhibition that explores the uterus and vagina from the perspective of someone who has painful periods every month and who doesn’t like most kinds of penetration”:

 

In conversation with Carolee Schneemann’s “Inner Scroll,” and to a lesser extent, Magenta Baribeau’s Maman? Non Merci!, my work explores the vagina, the uterus, and the vulva, or to be more specific, my vagina, my uterus, and my vulva, in ways that I feel are at times unacceptable to express within feminist circles. My work sometimes depicts penetration as disgusting or scary, because that’s where I’m at in my process of learning to be comfortable with my body. Similarly, some of my other works depict periods as violent and aggressive, because that’s how my period feels to me sometimes. I want to make it clear that I’m not advocating for people to be disgusted with their bodies or periods, but merely voicing my reality, merely saying that sometimes, when I sit in on feminist community events, I’m frustrated that the body, and more specifically the uterus, is mystified and uncritically celebrated. I want there to be space to express discomfort with one’s body or with sex without being labeled as body-shaming or sex-shaming, so that people, like me, who still struggle with total body image, who are uncomfortable with things like penetration sometimes, and who cannot, and will not ever be able to embrace periods beyond the point of agreeing that they should not be taboo have a space to speak. Because sometimes it is so hard to not be allowed to openly critique something that causes you so much pain, and that is, for now, incurable. But again, this is all coming from the person who interviewed you all about your periods a few weeks back! All from the person who wants to talk about periods, and make them less taboo! But I’m also the person who wants to move beyond the current popular discourse in feminist circles in Montreal, that are uncritically celebratory of period experiences, and silence those who wish to speak about their frank dislike of them (that sometimes co-exists with their appreciation of periods of course!).So all in all, I’m a little nervous about sharing this work, both because I’m afraid that the content may come to bite me in the uterus ass later, and because I’m nervous that despite my whole spiel, my work will simply be dismissed as some body-negative, sex-negative art, making me a “bad feminist.”

QuestionHas she consulted an endocrinologist? To convert one’s medical and/or psychiatric problems into a senior-level university project for “Feminist Cultural Perspectives” is a sort of academic alchemy, where“the personal is political” means you are entitled to three semester credits for complaining about your menstrual cycle. Women’s Studies promotes a feminist ideology which views activism as a valid substitute for therapy, so that the student gets academic credit for producing art that depicts vaginal “penetration as disgusting or scary” as part of “my process of learning to be comfortable with my body.”

 

Alas, sarcasm is “counter-productive”! Students in WSDB491 are OK with a movie celebrating serial killer Aileen Wuornos, but sarcasm is impermissible. Meanwhile, this is a senior project:

Exploring the links between archiving and activist action/intervention, my final project, in conversation with The Lesbian Avengers Documentary Project, is a zine documenting and commenting on the creation of the first dyke marches in Montreal from 2012 to the present. This zine is also part of a larger project called LEARNING HOW TO SCREAM, an activist and archival project which by its focus on lesbian lives, theory and activism aims to confront lesbian history and make sense of it in contemporary contexts.
As part of this project, I will be facilitating a lecture series next semester on lesbian theory and activism.

 

Women’s Studies at one of Canada’s largest universities means a “discursive construction of gender” through studying “rape culture,” an art project about menstrual cramps, and a lecture series about “dyke marches” and lesbian theory. When the only thing you produce is ridiculous gibberish, sarcasm is counter-productive.

 

How to Hurt Women

http://www.dangerandplay.com/2015/12/22/how-feminism-destroys-women/

 

Imagine you were a misogynist who wanted to inflict as much harm on women as humanly possible. You were ambitious and wanted to design an entire society around inflicting harm on women. What might you do?

I can think of a few ideas that would lead 25% of women to take anti-depressants. These ideas would also crease the rate of rapes by over 1,000%.

Import a rape culture from abroad.

Sweden was a quiet, civilized country until a War on Women was declared.

In efforts to increase the amounts of rape women endured, misogynists imported hundreds of thousands of men from a culture where rape was common.

Sweden is now the rape capital of the West.

A 1996 Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention report bears this out. It noted that Muslim immigrants from North Africa were 23 times more likely to commit rape than Swedish men. It is no wonder why today Sweden is deemed the rape capital of the Western world.

Congrats, Sweden, for harming more women than I or any other misogynist ever could have.

Rape Capital of World Sweden.43 AM

Jealous of Sweden’s “success,” the UK began importing massive amounts of rapists. In Rotherham over 1,400 young women and little girls were sold into sexual slavery:

One 11-year-old known as Child H told police that she and another girl had been sexually assaulted by grown men. Nothing was done. When she was 12, Child H was found in the back of a taxi with a man who had indecent pictures of her on his phone. Despite the full co-operation of her father, who insisted his daughter was being abused, police failed to act. Four months later, Child H was found in a house alone with a group of Pakistani men. What did the police do? They arrested the child for being drunk and disorderly and ignored her abusers. As President Obama said about the fiends who beheaded the journalist James Foley: “No just God would stand for what they did.”

President Obama, jealous of Sweden and the UK, has insisted that the U.S. begin importing rape culture into the United States. Soon America will increase its overall number of rates by tenfold.

Give rape hoaxes massive publicity and promote false accusations of rape against men.

Although rape happens in the U.S. far less often than in Sweden, rape happens too often. While rape, like all evil, will never go away, we should always take it seriously.

The best way to get people to stop taking rape seriously is to publicize rape hoaxes.

Ezra Klein rape false rape

Rolling Stone made the world stop with a great rape hoax:

Rolling Stone set out in advance to find a sensational story of graphic and violent rape, searched for such a story at elite universities, and rejected other possible stories because the sexual assaults they portrayed were too ‘normal.’ Rolling Stone endorsed and encouraged [Sabrina Rubin] Erdely’s efforts to troll elite American college campuses in search of a sensational and graphic rape narrative, and rejected potential stories from universities such as Yale that lacked the sensational quality Rolling Stone sought. Rolling Stone and Erdely had an agenda, and they were recklessly oblivious to the harm they would cause innocent victims in their ruthless pursuit of that agenda.”

The international media stopped the world with the Duke lacrosse rape hoax:

In March 2006, Crystal Gail Mangum, an African-American student at North Carolina Central University who worked as a stripper, dancer and escort, falsely accused three white Duke University students – all members of the Duke Blue Devils men’s lacrosse team – of raping her. The alleged rape occurred at a party held at the house of two of the team’s captains in Durham on March 13, 2006. Many persons involved in or commenting on the case, including District Attorney Nifong, stated or suggested that the alleged rape was a hate crime.

Oxford had a great rape hoax, although it ended before gaining worldwide attention.

Oxford Rape Hoax

The media is now promoting the Stoya rape hoax.

The more rape hoaxes you publicize, the better!

After all, the goal is to hurt women. What better way to hurt woman than to make it seem like every rape accusation is an attention-seeking hoax?

Rape hoaxes also make me less likely to date women, as the risks do not outweigh the benefits. Is she worth a false rape accusation? More men are opting out of dating women.

Peddle bogus rape statistics.

Although rape does not happen to 1-in-5 women, it happens too often. There’s not a father or brother or husband or friend who doesn’t worry about the women in his life.

Yet when you suggest that the United States has rape numbers similar to the Congo, no one will take the problem of rape seriously.

Serious people begin to doubt that rape even occurs.

 

Emasculate men and destroy male heroism.

Women prefer being feminine. Men prefer being masculine. Feminine women are happiest with a masculine men.

Attack men from birth. Tell them they are damaged and diseased. Drug them when they fail to conform or have trouble sitting down while a school teacher lectures them.

This will have the awesome effect of destroying men and women.

Women are not attracted to feminized and androgynous men.

As the supply of masculine men decreases, the remaining women will have to do what masculine men tell them to do. Thus casual sex will be on the rise as more women compete for fewer men.

ANOTHER ladies’ night, not by choice. After midnight on a rainy night last week in Chapel Hill, N.C., a large group of sorority women at the University of North Carolina squeezed into the corner booth of a gritty basement bar. Bathed in a neon glow, they splashed beer from pitchers, traded jokes and belted out lyrics to a Taylor Swift heartache anthem thundering overhead. As a night out, it had everything — except guys.

Danger & Play men are cleaning up these days. Although they recognize that society is collapsing, they have more access to women than ever before.

Bonus: With fewer men and women coupling up, birth rates decline. This gives you the ability to argue that rapists should be imported in order to slow the population decline.

Create “free trade” policies.

American workers cannot slave away for the same wages as others in developing countries.

By putting “free trade” above all else, you’ll make it impossible for a man to support his family.

This will mean every mom has to work rather than nurture her children, just to keep the family’s head above water.

You’ll also increase financial stress in the home, leading to more divorces and higher rates of alcoholism.

Would this plan to hurt women work?

In the U.S. 25% of women are on antidepressants. Many are alcoholics. Most women under 30 are alcoholics or have serious drinking problems.

Working class men and women are committing suicides in record numbers.

That finding was reported Monday by two Princeton economists, Angus Deaton, who last month won the 2015 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science, and Anne Case. Analyzing health and mortality data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and from other sources, they concluded that rising annual death rates among this group are being driven not by the big killers like heart disease and diabetes but by an epidemic of suicides and afflictions stemming from substance abuse: alcoholic liver disease and overdoses of heroin and prescription opioids.

What can you do if you do not hate women?

By now you understand that liberals, feminists, and SJWs hate women. Every policy the enact harms women in ways we could never have dreamed up.

If you care about the future of the West, then it’s time to time to clean house and take back our nation. Only Donald Trump offers any hope to the U.S.

Otherwise there’s not much the individual man can do other than reap the rewards of a debased society.

I’ve lived a life others couldn’t have dreamed of. Even I had no idea how a declining Western society could benefit men.

We men are fighting a war of attrition.

If you remain masculine while all of your fellow men fall off and become weak, you’ll have the time of your life.

Today is the best time in the history of man to be alive. You can have the sex life of a Roman emperor if you have a dominant mindset and live a great lifestyle.

Fight back in your own way. Not everyone needs to or should do what I do.

My very existence outrages thousands of people, not because of any trolling, but because of who I am.

Be masculine.

Masculine men stand out among dopes and cowards.

Beautiful women love masculine men.

The debased, filthy, and ugly despise masculine men.

Attack the women you want by fighting back against our enemies by refusing to surrender your birthright.

It’s your right as a man to be a man.

Anyone who tells you otherwise is trying to steal from you.

You don’t respond to a thief with courtesy.

You destroy them.

That’s the Danger & Play way.