Q: NOW COMES THE REAL PAIN. NOW COMES THE TRUTH.

It’s time for an update about the STORM that is coming. Because it’s real. It’s quantifiable. And if you’re name is Hillary Clinton, Loretta Lynch, Valerie Jarrett, James Comey, Adam Schiff, John Brennan, Robert Mueller, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, or John and Tony Podesta, you’re most definitely in a panic RIGHT NOW. Here’s exactly why.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBN7ReuMrwQ

Liberal/left racism: Leftists and Labour Members Racially Abuse Black Tory London Mayoral Candidate

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/tory-mayor-contender-shaun-bailey-targeted-by-labour-race-hate-trolls-a3957216.html

Shaun Bailey, the Tory contender for Mayor of London, today revealed how he has been subjected to appalling racist attacks by Labour supporters.

The London Assembly member has been called a “vile disgusting Uncle Tom”, a “lying coconut” and a “token ethnic” since announcing he wanted to challenge Sadiq Khan for City Hall. Mr Bailey condemned the abuse and called for the mayoral election campaign to be a “battle of ideas” on issues affecting millions of Londoners, such as housing, transport and crime.

He told the Evening Standard: “We cannot have a contest that is plagued by racial abuse, mud-slinging and identity politics.

These attacks are poisoning the well of public debate and have no place in a modern, progressive tolerant Britain,” he said.

Mr Bailey is forwarding details of the Twitter attacks on him by people who claim to be Labour members to party chiefs, after Jeremy Corbyn vowed to root out racism within its ranks.

The attacks include:

  • A Momentum-supporting Labour member tweeting: “Shaun Bailey is the biggest Uncle Tom to walk the planet” and a “vile disgusting Uncle Tom”.  It is a derogatory term for a black man considered to be “excessively obedient or servile to white people”.
  • Another Labour member from London messaged: “Shaun Bailey is the new token ethnic … ”
  • A third Labour member claimed: “The Tories simply can’t find a candidate with any experience for London Mayor to go against @SadiqKhan  @MayorofLondon so they’ve chosen an Uncle Tom @ShaunBaileyUK.”
  • A Labour supporter tweeted: “Shaun Bailey’s a lying coconut.” The term “coconut” is used to accuse individuals of betraying their race, or culture, by implying that they are “brown on the outside but white on the inside”.
  • A “socialist” from the capital messaged: “London IS a diverse city which must have a mayor who respects ALL religions and we do NOT deserve to be represented by a bigoted coconut.”
  • A Corbyn supporter replied to Mr Bailey: “You remind me of that Greek-Cypriot bloke on Gogglebox who ran for Ukip and that black Tory bloke on Big Brother who let all the Tories call him ‘Golly’.”

Mr Bailey has recently faced criticism over past statements, including a pamphlet he wrote 13 years ago on how Britain is failing young people in inner cities. In a section on multiculturalism, he said: “You bring your children to school and they learn far more about Diwali than Christmas. I speak to the people who are from Brent and they’ve been having Muslim and Hindi days off.  What it does is rob Britain of its community.”

It is also claimed that when he was a parliamentary candidate for Hammersmith he said there was a “cottage industry” of women becoming pregnant to secure a council home.

Mr Bailey grew up in a Ladbroke Grove neighbourhood blighted by crime and is a former youth and crime adviser to David Cameron. He said today: “I did express concern — in the rather raw and ill-judged manner of a young man still figuring out his world — about the lack of integration in communities and its potential impact on social cohesion.”

A Labour Party spokeswoman said: “Labour does not tolerate racism of any kind. We won’t take any lessons from the Tories who deliberately targeted Diane Abbott in their negative general election material.”

 

 

School under fire for turning blind eye to female students’ false sex assault allegations

A Pennsylvania high school has come under fire for its handling of false sexual assault allegations brought against a male student by five “mean girls” — who are accused of targeting the teen because they “just don’t like him.”

School officials were forced to put out a statement on Monday defending their actions after local reports revealed that nothing was ever done to punish the female classmates.

“The number-one priority of the Seneca Valley School District is the safety and well-being of our students, staff, parents and volunteers who enter our buildings,” the statement said, according to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

“We have policies and procedures in place to protect individuals, and we communicate to all employees on these policies and work hard every day to provide a safe and caring learning environment for all.”

Social media users had been calling on the Seneca Valley School District to apologize for its handling of the situation, but they reportedly refused.

“Reading this story makes me sick to my stomach,” tweeted the Seneca Valley “Student Section.”

“Those girls should face major consequences for this,” added Maddie Rush, a Seneca Valley alum. “Lying about sexual assault is not a joke.”

The boy’s parents, Michael J. and Alecia Flood, filed a lawsuit last week against the district, Seneca Valley High School and the parents of the girls involved.

“We feel strongly the lawsuit being filed against the Seneca Valley School District is without merit,” said district officials. “We have followed all applicable laws, and we will vigorously defend ourselves throughout the process.”

In their suit, the boy’s parents claim his life was ruined as a result of the false sex assault allegations, which were made against him in July 2017 and March 2018 by two different girls — and then falsely corroborated by three others.

“[The teen] was forced to endure multiple court appearances, detention in a juvenile facility, detention at home, the loss of his liberty, and other damages until several of the girls reluctantly admitted that their accusations were false,” the suit says, identifying the boy as “T.F.”

His family’s lawyer, Craig Fishman, told the Tribune-Review that he also suffered from severe bullying and “gender bias.”

“(T.F.) was basically being tortured in school by the other students and investigators, but the administration was only focused on protecting the girls who were lying,” Fishman said. “Once the allegations were proven false, they really didn’t care one bit about T.F. and there has been absolutely no repercussions against the girls.”

According to PennLive, one of the female accusers told school officials in a 2017 interview that she and the other “mean girls” made up the allegations because they “just don’t like him.”

“I just don’t like to hear him talk,” she reportedly disclosed. “I don’t like to look at him.”

In October 2017, the same girl told her classmates “that she would do anything to get T.F. expelled” and admitted that she “accused T.F. of sexual assault,” according to the suit.

The Floods are reportedly seeking unspecified civil damages, and are now homeschooling their boy to avoid further abuse.

“A disgrace that one of the nicest kids, and sincere families in Seneca has to deal with this,” tweeted former Seneca Valley student Ryan Senka. “Actions like this damage true victims of sexual assault claims, and will make a district attorney double think before bringing charges against a true abuser.”

https://nypost.com/2018/10/08/school-under-fire-for-turning-blind-eye-to-female-students-false-sex-assault-allegations/?utm_source=reddit.com