Communism Is Satanic by Nature

#Communism has caused more than 100 million unnatural deaths in the last century, and has pushed programs of economic slavery, cultural destruction, and forced atheism. Beneath its facade of “liberation” and “equality” is a system that aims to destroy the foundations of social harmony, pushing instead an #ideology of hatred and struggle. To understand the nature of communism, we take a look at the #Satanic writings of Karl Marx and at the nature of moral inversion inherent in its doctrine.

Correction: Two quotes in the images have the wrong name attributed to them. They state Marx, but should state Mikhail Bakunin, who was one of Marx’s partners in the First International. These quotes are “The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority, revolt in which we see the fecund germ of all human emancipations, the revolution. Socialists recognize each other by the words ‘In the name of the one to whom a great wrong has been done.’” And, “In this revolution we will have to awaken the Devil in the people, to stir up the basest passions. Our mission is to destroy, not to edify.” We apologize for the error.

The Mask as a Symbol of Subjugation

by Bill Willers / July 3rd, 2020

We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.
The New England Journal of Medicine, May 21, 2020

(T)hey told us exactly what was coming, and advised us to shut up and follow orders. Tragically, most people have done just that.
CJ Hopkins, 2020

It’s difficult to imagine a crueler attack on the human family than the insidious prevention of person-to-person contact. What amounts to house arrest, plus enforced wearing of masks, plus the order to stay a body length from others, has the stated aim of preventing contagion, but as philosopher Giogio Agamben put it recently, “It is political contagion, let it be understood”. He’s correct. The contagion that must be checked is not viral but political. The triad of official mandates hinders communication that cannot be monitored. If online, unauthorized political discourse and strategy can be recorded for the individual’s dossier. In the street not so, at least not yet.

In 1933, Hitler suspended the Weimar Constitution following the Reichstag fire. Citizen rights under that Constitution were abolished and never reinstated. A similar drama continues to play out in the United States since the 9/11 attack, which resulted in the Patriot Act (of ironic title) that trashes the U.S. Constitution, resulting in free rein for the nation’s intelligence organizations in concert with the social media giants. The First Amendment is being negated according to someone’s definition of “hate speech” or “community standards”, with entire sites of information and opinion being “deplatformed”. The Fourth Amendment is a hollow lie in that each citizen’s every act is recorded toward that planned-for day in which all activities are digitally recorded, and woe betide creative souls who offend the rules.

The lockdown was never really about a pandemic. Covid19 was just the pretext. Bill Gates himself admitted (in an unguarded moment?) that earlier SARS and MERS were more “fatal,” i.e., more lethal, than Covid19, yet they came and went without crashing the economy. But more than just the economy, it was day-to-day existence as we all live it that was a prime target of the lockdown. Ending the lockdown tomorrow would not counter the damage already done. We’ve been psychologically mauled, and there’s no end in sight. Warnings of “spikes” and of future waves come daily. Yes, countless jobs and businesses are being lost, but it is the devastating psychological impact that permeates society throughout that is inescapable. The emotional and spiritual damage will not be healing anytime soon. As intended, we are disoriented and will be for decades as the “conspiring internationalists”, so-called by David Rockefeller, prepare us for a life according to their globalist design.

The cloth masks seen everywhere now are symbolic. However useful in stopping airborne droplets, they do not hinder the passage of viruses, made clear by the warning on a box of the type of mask commonly seen. The media’s favorite expert, Anthony Fauci, stated flatly on CBS 60 Minutes in March that “There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask”. Two months later, as lockdown demands intensified, his stance shifted to the mask as “a symbol for people to see”. Review articles indicating that masks are ineffective, or even counterproductive, rarely make it to mainstream viewers, or they are simply disappeared. But symbol the mask certainly is — a symbol of subjugation.

Living fully and free carries a normal level of risk. In addition to assorted germs and parasites that are a part of nature, there are lightning strikes, auto collisions, falling down stairs and being victimized by criminals — primarily elements within our governing structures. We are being conned with a manufactured terror campaign by a power bloc that considers the bulk of ordinary society a herd to be manipulated. The many who understand this, but who nevertheless wear a mask simply to conform to what they assume to be majority agreement, are allowing themselves to become part of the con. Take the damned thing off! Breathe free! Bill Willers is an emeritus professor of biology, University of Wisconsin at Oshkosh. He is founder of the Superior Wilderness Action Network and editor of Learning to Listen to the Land, and Unmanaged Landscapes, both from Island Press. He can be contacted at willers@uwosh.edu. Read other articles by Bill.

This article was posted on Friday, July 3rd, 2020 at 8:28am and is filed under COVID-19 (coronavirus), Health/Medical, Opinion.

How the New Left Is Perpetuating Satanism in Society

Commentary

https://www.theepochtimes.com/how-the-new-left-is-perpetuating-satanism-in-society_2806197.html#

In a previous article, I explained the true origin of left and right, and how this relates to the ancient paradigm of the left-hand and right-hand paths. This has manifested in many ways over millennia, and much of my work has involved informing the public about the false framing of morality by those (consciously or otherwise) on the left-hand path.

The reason that this topic matters is because left and right are either falsely dismissed as irrelevant, pushing us toward subjective morality, or mischaracterized as a system of “might makes right” that further enables subjective morality.

This sets a very dangerous precedent, because if there’s one term that defines evil, it’s subjective morality. This can be described as the belief that morality is decided by the individual, rather than a universal law independent of people. This leads to the belief that you can do whatever you want, as long as you can get away with it.

We must break the stranglehold of this way of thinking if we’re going to create something better. Unfortunately, subjective morality is attractive to a great multitude of people, meaning that it’s a difficult process to undo. We must, therefore, peel away the layers upon layers of pseudo-philosophical confusion that justify subjective morality and attack objective truth.

What, however, will we find once we accomplish this? The answer to this question isn’t something that secular society is necessarily ready for, but what we’re truly dealing with is Satanism. This may seem hyperbolic, possibly hysterical, but Satanism doesn’t necessarily relate to a literal entity. It can also relate to a state of mind.

In this article, I will begin to define Satanism, and how it’s perpetuated in society.

Saul Alinsky

The political left stems from Satanic ideology, and it’s unfortunate that an emotional or sentimental attachment prevents people from seeing why. In community organizer Saul Alinsky’s magnum opus, “Rules for Radicals,” he acknowledged Lucifer thusly: “Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins—or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom—Lucifer.”

Some deny that Satan and Lucifer are one and the same, partly because the word Satan means accuser or adversary in Hebrew, and the Old Testament does not talk of Satan as a person. Lucifer is mentioned in Isaiah 14, when he fell from Heaven after trying to supplant God as “the most high.” While it’s true that Satan is only personified in the New Testament, this came from the Old Testament description of Lucifer, whose name was changed to Satan upon defeat, because he was the adversary that accused God.

It’s important to understand this, because Lucifer (and Satan, by extension) is the archetype of the left. Alinsky suggested that Lucifer fought against the established order and won his own kingdom in the process, this being not only Hell, but authority on earth, as per New Testament passages such as Revelations 12:9 and 1 John 5:19.

Alinsky’s acknowledgment embodies the way that the left models the Luciferian archetype of rebellion against the established order, and it’s for this reason that the left perpetually attacks tradition and conservative values. Just as Lucifer used lies to convince many angels to follow him, left-wing leaders use the same strategy.

Some may argue that there are times when rebellion is necessary, such as the American Revolution or the English Civil War, but there is a fundamental motivation that can’t be overlooked.

Order Out of Chaos

Those on the right-hand path seek order over chaos. When order is threatened by chaos, such as tyranny and injustice, rebellion is deemed justifiable. We can compare this to how the American Revolution was sparked by the injustice of taxation without representation, therefore destroying the chaos of tyrannical British rule.

Conversely, those on the left-hand path seek order out of chaos. By fomenting so much chaos that people become desperate for order, people will surrender their liberties for security. We can compare this to the chaos of the French Revolution that led to Napoleon’s dictatorship, or the manufactured chaos of the Chinese Cultural Revolution that made people desperate enough to worship Mao Zedong like a god.

Another significant facet of Satanic ideology is inversion, which is why Satanic symbols are inverted forms of the original (the inverted pentagram or cross, for example). The left claim that their rebelliousness stems from intolerance and injustice in society, but even when they succeed, their craving for order out of chaos can never be satiated, as they forever move on to the next social-justice cause.

Today, it’s transgender bathrooms, plastic straws, or President Donald Trump, but tomorrow, who knows? What’s certain is that the left will never be content, because we don’t live in a utopia.

Lust for power is the true driving force behind leftist ideology, and it’s with this realization that we can truly begin to see why Alinsky was such a defining figure of the modern left. Each of the 12 rules that Alinsky defined demonstrate that the left are motivated only by power, and those without moral standards will be pressured to choke on their own book of rules, as we see with Alinsky’s fourth rule, “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

Thus, we can now see why the modern left does indeed epitomize the ancient and occult left-hand path, a powerful form of psychological conditioning perpetuated in society by master manipulators. Alinsky merely adapted these ancient techniques to a modern setting by appealing to the egotistical weaknesses of human beings.

As the saying goes, you can’t reason with the unreasonable, and when you’re dealing with people who see chaos as a means to an end, you’ll never be able to defend yourself until you’re prepared to acknowledge, just as Alinsky did, that the roots of the left are Satanic.

Cid Lazarou is a blogger, writer, and freelance journalist from the UK.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/how-the-new-left-is-perpetuating-satanism-in-society_2806197.html#

The True Origin of Left and Right

Commentary

https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-true-origin-of-left-and-right_2724021.html

In previous articles, I’ve explained how we can achieve a better understanding of left and right. In the first instance, I focused on the way left and right are both subversively framed as left-wing ideologies that essentially stand for the same authoritarian “might makes right” values. In the second instance, I explained how collectivism and individualism are better ways to understand the political spectrum, albeit open to corruption and subversion in their own right.

In this article, I will explain the true origin of left and right, via an ancient system of spirituality.

False Origins

Before we can truly understand this, we must establish where the false origins of left and right come from. The answer to this question is the French Revolution.

When the French National Assembly was formed in its short-lived existence during 1789, supporters of the king and the religious order sat on the right, and radicals sat on the left. These radicals were made up of the Jacobins, who would usher in the Reign of Terror. In addition to the beheading of Louis XVI, the last king of France, this would result in the massacre of hundreds of thousands of people by guillotine.

Ever since, it’s been argued that this is where left and right originates, but this is a false dichotomy akin to what I’ve previously described. One very important detail to bear in mind is that both sides of the French National Assembly were absolutists that stood for positive rights.

In other words, they saw no limits to power. Whether it was the right of the Assembly, who stood for the absolute authority of the monarchy, with the church as its guiding moral hand, or the Jacobins, who stood for a communal ideology that would become the foundation for communism, both groups did not stand for any kind of natural rights or limited government.

In the centuries that followed, this false dichotomy served absolutists well. It allowed them to manufacture a false dialectic—based on German philosopher Georg Hegel’s thought, which was later described as the triad of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis—in which they push the momentum of history in their pre-prescribed direction, partly through revisionist history about the origins of left and right. This culminates in synthesis after synthesis that concentrates power into the hands of a shrinking cabal of absolutist rulers, working toward an ever-expanding oligarchy of supranational organizations.

Hence, nowhere in modern political discourse do we hear about restrictions to power via limited government or natural law. Only in the United States is this tradition barely being kept alive, as constitutionalists struggle to hold back the power of the state.

Let us not forget, however, that the roots of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights emerged from a completely different struggle to the American Revolution—namely, the English Civil War. It was through this battle for liberty that the 1689 Bill of Rights would come to be formed from the works of John Locke—arguably the greatest natural rights philosopher in the last 300 years or so.

All this history is dismissed by those pretending that left and right originates with the French Revolution, as though the parliamentary struggle of England had no part to play.

A Spiritual Path

There is, however, a spiritual version of left and right that all others stem from. So ancient is this that it even appears in the Bible. Matthew 25:32–33 states that Jesus will “separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.”

Other parts of the Bible also describe how left and right relate to God, although Matthew 25 is perhaps the most revealing in this regard. As this chapter progresses to verse 41, it reads, “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.”

Some may be aware that the goat is a symbol of Satanism, and while there is no explicit Biblical reference to Satan sitting on the left side of God, the Bible does make it clear that Lucifer fell from Heaven in Isaiah 14:12, which states: “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!”

Despite some theological disagreements over whether Lucifer and Satan are one and the same, both are theological manifestations of the same antithesis to God. Perhaps Lucifer and Satan share a similar antithetical oneness as God the Father and Son.

What’s more important than such debate, however, is how the left-hand side of God is associated with the characteristics of the goat. Due to its nature, this animal is notoriously difficult to tame, making it an archetypal symbol of rebellion. Hence, the left-hand path tradition stems from rebellion against God.

The true origin of left and right is, therefore, an ancient dynamic, wherein those on the right-hand path respect the objective morality attributed to God and natural laws.

Those on the left-hand path reject such limits, sometimes through outright rebellion. Others attempt to use the tradition of divine right to become higher than God, as they claim to be God’s representatives on earth. Both can be summarized by a combination of relativism and legalism that places human authority above God and natural law—also known as “might makes right.”

Conversely, those on the right-hand path recognize free will and the personal responsibility that goes with this, placing God and natural law above human authority.

There’s a very good reason for why this ancient tradition is hidden from the masses, since freedom directly corresponds to the amount of morality we exhibit. When we believe that we can be laws unto ourselves, narcissism will enslave us all.

Cid Lazarou is a blogger, writer, and freelance journalist from the UK.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Black Misandry: Black Driver Charged With Murdering One Of The Racists Attacking Him And His White Girlfriend Stood His Ground, Lawyers Say

keeping y’all up to date with this

A Black driver jailed after fatally shooting at a “truckload of belligerent racists” trying to run him off the road should be held to the same legal standards as white defendants who cite Georgia’s Stand Your Ground laws, defense attorneys said on Monday. Lawyers representing William Marcus (Marc) Wilson hosted a virtual press conference to publicize the weeks-old case in the town of Statesboro one day ahead of a preliminary hearing in the case.

The 21-year-old college student was charged last month with one count of felony murder and one count of aggravated assault in the death of Haley Hutcheson, a 17-year-old inside the pursuing truck that defense lawyers say carried white people yelling racial slurs at Wilson and his girlfriend, who is white. But Wilson is legally allowed to carry the weapon he used to defend himself, his lawyers said, and should never have been charged in what they described as an unfortunate consequence.

The situation unfolded June 14 when Wilson and his girlfriend went for a late-night drive to Taco Bell. After getting their food, they say a truck began following them with its occupants yelling racial slurs and trying to run them off the road. The truck was allegedly playing music from “The Purge,” a movie about the one lawless night every year when vigilantes are all but encouraged to go wild with violence. Believing his life was in danger, he “fired off a warning shot” that struck Hutcheson, according to an online petition demanding Wilson be freed from the Bulloch County Detention Center.

“Marc Wilson and the occupant — his girlfriend — were in sheer terror that night,” Francys Johnson, a civil rights attorney based in Georgia, said during the press conference. “They expressed that to law enforcement … We think evidence will show that what Marc confronted was ‘a Black man’s worst nightmare.’”

When asked how he could be sure the incident was “racially motivated,” Johnson scoffed at that choice of language and said the people inside the car chasing Wilson were “yelling phrases like ‘nigger,’ ‘your lives don’t matter’ and called his girlfriend a ‘nigger lover.’” 

He declined to comment when asked how many times Wilson shot his gun.

Johnson said the Statesboro Police Department mismanaged the case from the start by immediately criminalizing Wilson despite state laws that should afford him his freedom. It is the same law, they said, that delayed arresting Ahmaud Arbery‘s killers for more than two months and also the same law that allowed George Zimmerman to be acquitted of killing Trayvon Martin in 2012.

“Marc Wilson and his girlfriend were not believed. Instead, they were treated like criminals. They were criminalized from the very moment this case began,” Johnson said. “They’ve been maligned with misleading statements from the community to suggest that they’re members of Antifa.”

As of Monday, the people inside the truck chasing Wilson have been arrested and Johnson said the truck involved was never even impounded, let alone inspected. He said the people in the truck are “known in Claxton,” a nearby city. “They have a reputation,” he added without elaborating.

Lawyers said they were reviewing closed-circuit security video footage from nearby businesses that night. However, while “portions” were able to be recorded, the alleged chase and the shooting took place in an area without any surveillance cameras.

Johnson said the police arrested the wrong person and that Wilson was not to blame for being a victim of a racist circumstance that he legally defended himself from to unfortunate results.

“The people in the truck should have been charged with felony aggravated assault and charged with the death of the passenger in their vehicle,” he said.

Mawuli Davis, one of the other lawyers representing Wilson, agreed that the case “shouldn’t have been handled the way that it was” and that “there should be no charges against him.”

Other lawyers on Wilson’s legal team include trial attorneys Martha Hall, Gary Spencer and Nefertara Clark. Johnson started a GoFundMe campaign to help pay for legal fees. As of Monday night, the amount donated had not crossed the halfway point of its goal of $25,000.

The Georgia NAACP state president, who also spoke during the press conference, said there is a lack of due process for Black people in America and cited what he said were inaccurate reports about Wilson that criminalized him from the start.

“He was the one who was literally defending his and his girlfriend’s lives,” James “Major” Woodall said. “Black people’s lives are not as important and valued under the law.”

Wilson’s parents also joined the press conference. His father stressed how he and his wife taught their son to trust law enforcement. But after seeing how police responded to the case, “I believe that trust has been broken,” Pat Wilson said.

“To know that he has been labeled, he has been pictured as someone that is part of terror, is so disheartening,” he added. “I know this young man has been about love, about peace. He did all he could to make a difference to save not only his life, but he was more concerned with her life.”

Wilson’s mother, who is white, suggested her son and girlfriend would have been lynched to death had he not used his legal firearm to defend himself.

“Had the roles been reversed and Marc not reacted the way he did, we’d be mourning two lives instead of one and we may not have ever known what happened that night.”