Biological Man who is convicted murderer wants to transfer to a woman’s prison

A convicted killer who is serving a life sentence in a penitentiary for men is demanding to be transferred to a women’s prison now that she’s self-identifying as a woman.

Jamie Boulachanis recently transitioned from a man to a woman under Canadian law and will have her case heard in which Correctional Service Canada is arguing Boulachanis shouldn’t be trasferred to a women’s facility–in spite of a Federal Court order–due to public safety concerns and his ability to escape prison.

In 2016 a Montreal jury found Boulachanis, born John Boulachanis, guilty of killing 32-year-old Robert Tanguay back in 1997. For years Tanguay’s body remained hidden, buried in sandpit.

According to the Montreal Gazette, Correctional Service Canada (CSC) is cited Boulachanis history of trying to escape detention, including one case where he escaped his restraints and ran from a prison bus before being tackled by a guard in less than a minute.

Sex offender who identifies as young girl reveals just how dangerous self-ID is

An eight-year-old girl trapped in a grown man’s body claims her collection of child pornography is a first amendment right. This is the logical result of self-identification. If people are what they say they are they can get away with anything. 

Joseph Gobrick is a 45-year-old male sex offender in Grand Rapids, Michigan, claims that he has “always been an 8-year-old girl.” So on top of being a female child, he also doesn’t age. He has self-ID’d himself into immortality. 

UT Austin Professor Under Fire for Defending Sex with Underage Boys

When word came that college students were staging yet another protest on the University of Texas at Austin’s campus, we shrugged.

Protesting is so commonplace on American campuses these days that we wonder when there’s time for class.

But as we reviewed the matter of this protest, our first reaction was disbelief. Students were protesting the fact that a Classics professor, Thomas K. Hubbard, has focused a significant part of his “scholarship” on arguing that sexual predation laws should be re-considered to lower the age of consent.

We wanted to know for ourselves whether it was true. So we pulled up a 22-page article by Hubbard in the journal Thymos titled “Sexual Consent and the Adolescent Male, or What Can We Learn From the Greeks.”

https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2019/12/18/a-ut-professor-advocates-pedophilia-why-are-we-paying-for-it/

Feminists Screaming About “Transgenderism” — Even Though They Birthed It. Written by Selwyn Duke

“One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman”
“No biological, psychic or economic destiny defines the figure that the human female has in the bosom of society; it is the whole of civilization that produces this intermediate product between the male and the castrated one that is described as feminine.”
Feminist, Paedophile and Nazi(Vichy France) Collaborator Simone de Beauvoir

https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/31550-feminists-screaming-about-transgenderism-even-though-they-birthed-it

Say, “Be careful what you wish for” or call it the law of unintended consequences. For decades feminists screamed “I am woman, hear me roar” — now it’s “Hear me squeal — a man just walked through our door!”

The issue? Men claiming womanhood (MCW, a.k.a. “transgenders”) are invading women’s spaces — such as bathrooms, locker rooms and prisons — and are entering female competitions, taking away gold and glory. Examples are MCW who in recent years won “women’s” titles in weightlifting, cycling, sprinting, golf long driving and even a beauty pageant.

This is no pretty picture to feminists. Wizened old Germaine Greer took heat in 2016 for saying that men getting a medical procedure “doesn’t make them a woman.” Ex-tennis star Martina Navratilova is currently being ostracized for writing that having MCW in women’s sports is “insane” and is “cheating.” Feminist writer Meghan Murphy just sued Twitter for banning her for tweeting “Men aren’t women” (my, my, employing white male linear logic!). And feminist Julia Beck (video below) was kicked off a Baltimore LGBT committee for using masculine pronouns when referencing, the nerve of her, a man.

Now, I’ve produced more material inveighing against “transgenderism” than you care to know (and that I care to have written). Yet there’s something here preventing me from endorsing these feminists’ fight unreservedly; it’s a striking blindness to a striking truth afflicting both liberals and most conservatives.

To wit: Feminists are now merely being hoisted with their own petards. They themselves laid the foundation for the transgender agenda they bemoan.

Let’s take a trip down Bad Memory Lane. For approximately three decades, the prevailing feminist doctrine was “gender neutrality” theory; it held that the sexes are the same except for the superficial physical differences and, therefore, raising boys and girls the same way will result in their being identical beneath the skin. This was embraced so radically that as iconoclastic feminist Camille Paglia once related, feminists would corner her on college campuses in the ‘70s, glaring, and swear that hormones didn’t exist and that, even if they did, they couldn’t possibly influence behavior.

Though I never believed it, I was accosted with this theory as a teen and young adult, as many of you no doubt were. It was convenient for feminists. After all, convince people of the sexes’ sameness, the thinking (feeling?) goes, and there can be no justification for keeping women from traditionally male arenas.

The social pressure brought to bear was profound, too. “Gender neutrality” theory was Science™, opposed only by knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing, backward Neanderthals. Sound familiar?

The connection to transgenderism should be obvious. The feminists spread notion A, “that the sexes are the same except for the superficial physical differences.” Then transgender activists came along and merely espoused B, a corollary:

If you change the superficial physical differences, you can be the opposite sex.

You can draw a straight line from one to the next — B absolutely, logically follows from A.

Related to this, some feminists complain that if a man can be female just by saying so, it dilutes the idea of “woman.” But did feminism not start this dilution with sameness-beneath-the-skin doctrine?

Moving on, feminists also claimed that not only can a woman do anything a man can do, but, by gum, she can perhaps even do it better. Children were inculcated with this “Girl Power” propaganda via cartoons, films and shows portraying unrealistic, masculinized female characters trouncing 300-pound men with ease.

This belief was applied to sports, too, with feminists claiming that the only reason men perform better is that they’ve had “greater opportunities.” Quack researchers even asserted that women’s marathon times would equal men’s by 1998 and that they’d achieve parity in shorter distances early in the 21st century (in reality, the intersex performance gap actually widened in the ‘90s).

This had the desired effect. When I used to work with kids, I encountered an 11-year-old boy who, it came out, supposed the women’s mile record should be better than the men’s; another lad of about the same age believed that the performance gap between the sexes was “very slight.” In this vein, Sportscience News reported in 1997 that “a pre-Olympic poll of 1,000 adults last May found that66 percent of Americans believe ‘the day is coming when top female athletes will beat top males at the highest competitive levels’ (Tharp, 1996).”

This is serious dislocation from reality. Note here that the 800-meter-run record for 14-year-old boys is better than the women’s world record; that Australia’s national women’s soccer team, then ranked fifth in the world, lost a 2016 scrimmage to an under-15 boys’ team 7-0; and that, more or less, this reflects the general intersex performance gap. But, again, the illusion is convenient for feminists. I mean, if women would equal men athletically but for discrimination, we’d better kick the opportunities and funding for them into high gear, right?

That is, it was convenient — until that desired effect had a side-effect. It’s another corollary: If the sexes’ athletic performances aren’t that much different to begin with, and if women are destined for parity, what’s the big deal about MCW competing in “women’s” sports? What advantage could the MCW really have after the chop-chop and flop reduces their testosterone levels?

No, not everyone believes the above. But enough do — because of feminist brainwashing — to sorely weaken the opposition to MCW in women’s sports.

The last point is that there’s real poetic justice here. Feminists spent decades aggressively invading previously male-only arenas, from the Virginia Military Institute and the Citadel to once exclusively male clubs to boys’ athletic teams to men’s locker rooms (female sports reporters). Now men — albeit those masquerading as women — are invading women’s spaces and the feminists cry foul. For years, however, they did everything they could to portray men and women as interchangeable parts. What did they think would happen?

They didn’t think. They were led by their passions, their emotions, like children, ignoring that ideas have consequences. Just because you’re wholly illogical — and even may dismiss logic as a white-male phenomenon — doesn’t mean your arguments won’t be taken beyond their utility for you and to their logical conclusion.

Yet feminists still haven’t learned. Ever seeking leverage via emotion-based, politically correct appeals, some now have the temerity to call transgenderism a “men’s rights movement” enabled by “straight men” who are “all about the trans.” It apparently eludes them that women currently have greater complicity in advancing transgenderism because they tend to support the leftists pushing it (e.g., percentagewise, women went Democrat 59-40 in the 2018 midterms; men went GOP 51-47).

Then again, maybe men deserve more blame than one may think. If our great-grandfathers had never let feminism rear its ugly head in the first place, we might not be where we are today.

Oscars to Go Hostless as Viewers Tune Out the Woke Award Show

It was once one of the most highly coveted gigs in comedy. Now no one wants the job as viewers at home are tuning out in droves.

The Oscars ceremony will once again go hostless, leaving this year’s white elephant of an awards show without an emcee to keep the proceedings moving. The ceremony has been moved up by nearly a month to Sunday Feb. 9, as part of organizers’ efforts to juice plummeting viewership and shorten Hollywood’s interminable awards season.

Variety reported Wednesday that Karey Burke, the head of ABC Entertainment, confirmed that the upcoming telecast will have “no traditional host” during a talk at the Television Critics Assn. winter press tour.

Last year, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences opted to go host-less for the first time in decades. Comedian and actor Kevin Hart had been tapped to host the show but abruptly stepped down after journalists dug up the star’s old tweets.

That show featured a slew of political moments from director Spike Lee urging the audience to “mobilize” against President Trump; actress Maya Rudolph warning Trump that Mexico won’t pay for a border wall, and actress Emilia Clarke saying U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg — like her Game of Thrones character Khaleesi — is “a woman who has spent her career at the forefront of the fight against gender discrimination.”

Hosting the Oscars has quickly become a job that few comedians wish to take on, due to unrelenting criticism from social media and overly censorious entertainment journalists.

The show, which usually clocks in well over three hours, is a challenge for even the most skilled comedians, requiring a light touch and an ability to find humor in what is essentially a stiff and lugubrious evening.

Ratings have fallen consistently since 2014’s high of 43.7 million viewers. In 2018, the show only managed to draw an audience of 26.5 million, its biggest yearly decline. That was the year the show was hosted by the anti-Trump Jimmy Kimmel, who feuded with President Donald Trump after the commander in chief mocked the ratings in a tweet.

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/01/08/oscars-to-go-hostless-as-viewers-tune-out-the-woke-award-show/

The racist pervert creep Jonathan Yaniv strikes again!

The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms has announced it is representing another esthetic salon against Jessica Yaniv at the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal.

The She Point Beauty Salon, owned and operated by women of the Sikh religion, has become the newest target for Yaniv’s litigation after declining Yaniv a Brazilian wax. Yaniv then demanded a leg wax, but was also refused on the same grounds. In their Tuesday morning Press Release, the Justice Centre notes that leg waxes are performed in private with the client undressed or nude from the waist down. Citing religious and safety reasons, the salon refused Yaniv service. 

The interaction occurred in August 2019, with the claim being filed at the BCHRT in October—the same month Yaniv lost a number of other identical complaints at the Tribunals. The complaints, made against mostly immigrant-owned aesthetic salons, were advanced due to some of the salon’s refusal to provide waxing services to Yaniv’s male scrotum. Other salons were asked to provide services to other parts of Yaniv’s body, but declined. All did so on grounds related to safety and/or religious restrictions on intimate-area touching between unrelated, unmarried males and females.

WOMXN: The Latest Biology Denying newspeak Aimed at Destroying Womanhood

The transgender/gender ideology movement began as the brainchild of three men and one woman who shared a common bond: all four were pedophilia activists.

Transgender activists are now pushing a new term, “womxn,” as a way of further blurring the biological, cultural, and legal lines between the sexes.

“Womxn” is a successor to “womyn,” which has been used by feminists since the ‘70s. The updated term is meant to be more inclusive, as it encompasses “trans and nonbinary” women. That is, men who identify as women.

The entry for “womyn” at dictionary.com notes:

Womyn is recorded as early as 1975 during second-wave feminism. One notable early instance was the Michigan Womyn’s Music Festival, which was held annually starting in 1976 until 2015. This was a feminist music festival only open to “womyn-born womyn,” i.e., or cisgender women. It was much criticized for its exclusion of transgender individuals, which exclusion has led to another alternative spelling of women, womxn, meant to include trans and nonbinary women in intersectional feminism.

The “womyn” music festival was eventually forced to close in 2015 after repeatedly being crashed by transgender men.

Daisy Jones, an editor at ViceUK, uses the term “womxn,” which she says “denotes gender fluidity and inclusivity.”

But the idea behind “womxn,” that there is no inherent biological basis behind masculinity or femininity, has been criticized by both conservatives and feminists.

The feminist Women’s Liberation Front, for instance, has come out in opposition to such paragons of the trans movement as men competing in women’s sports, stating of the practice:

“Inferior male athletes are finding ways to earn lots of money and fame at women’s expense. Many countries reward Olympians with cash bonuses, not to mention ad revenue. Men have no place in women’s sports; they are cheats, one and all.”

An anonymous woman who describes herself as a black lesbian prosecutor wrote on Twitter that “the consequences for women are extraordinary” if transgender men are treated the same as biological women, adding:

“Males will then be allowed in women’s showers, sports, dorms, prisons, rape shelters, etc. *All* our sex-based rights wld be forfeit. This is, obviously, a non-starter. We will not submit.”

The pro-homosexual LGB Alliance struck back at the new “womxn” language, arguing that its advocates aim of “expanding the definition of women” makes women’s rights “meaningless.”

The transgender movement seeks to force government, businesses, and the public in general to treat transgenders as the members of the opposite sex they claim to be.

The Obama administration pushed a rule that directed school officials to enforce “gender identity” claims of transgender children on their normal classmates without regard to children’s privacy or parents’ input. President Trump ditched the rule in February.

“If people knowing how biology works somehow invalidates your existence, then you need to seek help,” responded feminist historian Katie Parker. “Everyone is valid as a human being, forcing others to participate in a lie doesn’t increase your ‘validity’. Your worth shouldn’t rely on others to see you as something you are not.”

In some cases, the transgender movement is being used by men who wish to gain advantages they would not normally enjoy while identifying as their own sex.

There is the example from October of this year, for example, of “Rachel” McKinnon, a male philosophy professor and cyclist from Canada who identifies as a woman and was thus allowed to not only compete, but place first at the UCI Women’s Master Track Championship in Manchester.

There is also the case of transgender men who, because they identify as women, expect lesbians to sleep with them. The reluctance of many lesbians to sleep with trans “women” who have male genitalia has sparked outrage from the most extreme social justice warriors.

“At the end of the day, if your reason for not dating any transgender person is because of their trans-status, that doesn’t mean you’re not transphobic — because you are,” said a transgender activist in a video.

The convolutedness of the gender fluidity ideology has culminated in stupefying cases like the recent news of a trans “man” with a “non-binary” partner who gave birth to a baby using a “female” sperm donor.”

39-year-old Reuben Sharpe began living as a man 12 years ago. Sharpe’s partner, a biological female named Jay, identifies as “non-binary” and has had a double mastectomy. The UK couple were assisted in their child-bearing efforts by a trans doctor.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/family/item/34479-womxn-the-latest-lgbtq-newspeak-aimed-at-destroying-womanhood

First Trans Person to Obtain Legal ‘Non-Binary’ Sex Status Changes Back to Birth Sex in Blow to LGBT Movement

This month, the first person to obtain a legal “non-binary” sex designation has successfully petitioned the court originally responsible for his “non-binary” status to order that the sex on his birth certificate be restored to “male.” In documents exclusively provided to PJ Media, James Shupe’s petition described his “non-binary” designation as a “psychologically harmful legal fiction.” He told PJ Media he hopes this decision will prevent a woman currently seeking “non-binary” recognition from following the same lies.

“The charade of not being male, the legal fiction, it’s over,” James Shupe told PJ Media on Tuesday. “The lies behind my fictitious sex changes, something I shamefully participated in, first to female, and then to non-binary, have been forever exposed. A truthful accounting of events has replaced the deceit that allowed me to become America’s first legally non-binary person.”

“The legal record has now been corrected and LGBT advocates are no longer able to use my historic non-binary court order to advance their toxic agenda,” he added. “I am and have always been male. That is my biological truth, the only thing capable of grounding me to reality.”

While he became a hero for the transgender movement, Shupe now aims to dispel the lies of gender identity and reverse the harm caused by the precedent of his “non-binary” legal designation.

He referenced the case of Jones David Hollister, a woman who identifies as non-binary and is currently fighting to change her legal designation to non-binary. Hollister’s brief to the Oregon Court of Appeals cites Shupe’s case.

“I hope that Hollister and all the others are denied the right to change their sex to non-binary because it’s fraud and legal fiction based on pseudoscience,” Shupe said. “I was indoctrinated to believe that I had this thing called a gender identity and that suppressing it was causing my mental health problems. It was all a lie.”

He said he had embraced the lie of transgender identity as a crutch while struggling with deep psychological issues that would have been better addressed by therapy.

“I ended up in the psych ward three times because of hormones. I had blood clots in my eyes because my estrogen levels were 2,585 instead of 200, low bone density, problems controlling my bladder, and emotional instability,” Shupe said. “Blood tests indicated I was dropping into kidney disease territory (EFGR below 60) for about 18 months, I had chronic dermatology issues and skin reactions to estrogen patches, I passed out on the kitchen floor from Spironolactone.”

High-strength marijuana prescribed to him as he was passing through Colorado gave him hallucinations.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/ex-trans-man-reverses-non-binary-sex-designation-in-blow-to-lgbt-movement/

Social media history of Julie Berman’s alleged killer paints a complicated picture

The homicide of transgender activist Julie Berman last week in Toronto remains under investigation but her death has sent shockwaves across Canada, leading to a torrent of rumours and speculation.

Colin Harnack, a 29-year-old Toronto resident, was charged with second-degree murder but his relationship to Berman and the LGBT community is still unknown. While Berman’s death has largely been interpreted by activists and politicians, including Toronto Mayor John Tory, as a transphobic hate crime, Harnack’s extensive social media posts complicate that narrative. 

Harnack’s social media activity is mainly focused on his musical endeavours and appears to have dwindled over the last year. However, a number of posts indicate support for left-wing positions, including LGBT rights. Harnack himself specifically declined to identify with a gender in some posts. 

In one post on Instagram from 2017, he shared a photograph of an “all-gender restroom” sign and used the hashtags #lgbt, #bewhoyouwanttobe, #love and others. In an older post, he poses in a female Indian dress.

In one video published in February 2019 on YouTube, Harnack superimposes his face on both male and female bodies and includes a number of spiritual images connected to the Indigenous community. He has numerous other posts on his Facebook expressing criticism of colonialism.

One of his musical covers posted on YouTube is of the song “Gay Rude Boys Unite,” by the anti-homophobia, anti-racist radical punk band Leftöver Crack. 

Of the few social media friends linked to Harnack’s Facebook is the owner of a women’s clothing shop which sells “breast forms” and caters to the trans and fetish communities. 

According to new information provided to The Post Millennial, Toronto Police detective Rob Choe says that Berman and Harnack met the day of the incident and spent time socializing together before the attack occurred. Choe was unable to confirm whether or not the two had become intimate and said police are still investigating.

The Post Millennial was unable to reach Harnack for comment and it is unknown if he has a lawyer.